Case detail
INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner
503 U.S. 79 (1992)
Court
Supreme Court
Date
1992-02-26
Outcome
for-government
Holding
Expenses incurred in a friendly takeover that produce significant long-term benefits must generally be capitalized rather than deducted as ordinary and necessary expenses.
Facts
National Starch (later INDOPCO) incurred investment-banker and legal fees in a friendly acquisition by Unilever. The company deducted the fees as ordinary expenses.
Reasoning
Justice Blackmun held that a separate and distinct asset was not required for capitalization; the test was whether expenses produced significant long-term benefits. The decision triggered uncertainty about deductibility of business expansion costs, ultimately prompting Treasury to issue regulations creating safe harbors.
Case metadata
Official opinion
Open official decisionRelated citations
Computed from the cross-reference graph. Links open the related entity on this site.
This entry cites
- StatuteIRC §162
- StatuteIRC §263
- CaseFrank Lyon Co. v. United States
Cited by
- StatuteIRC §263
Primary sources
- Justia: INDOPCO v. CommissionerVerified 2026-05-20
Important disclaimer
This library is for general tax education only. Always verify filing obligations, due dates, and tax consequences against the cited primary source or with a qualified tax professional.