Case detail
Frank Lyon Co. v. United States
435 U.S. 561 (1978)
Court
Supreme Court
Date
1978-04-18
Outcome
for-taxpayer
Holding
A sale-and-leaseback transaction with genuine economic substance and business purpose will be respected for tax purposes; the test looks at the multi-party realities and obligations of the transaction.
Facts
Frank Lyon Co. purchased a building from Worthen Bank under regulatory pressure and leased it back. The IRS challenged Lyon's ownership for tax purposes.
Reasoning
Justice Blackmun held that when there is a genuine multi-party transaction with economic substance compelled by business or regulatory realities, the legal form should be respected. The opinion articulated factors that became influential in subsequent substance-over-form analysis.
Case metadata
Official opinion
Open official decisionLater cases in this library
Related citations
Computed from the cross-reference graph. Links open the related entity on this site.
This entry cites
- StatuteIRC §167
Cited by
Primary sources
- Justia: Frank Lyon Co. v. United StatesVerified 2026-05-20
Important disclaimer
This library is for general tax education only. Always verify filing obligations, due dates, and tax consequences against the cited primary source or with a qualified tax professional.