Case detail
James v. United States
366 U.S. 213 (1961)
Court
Supreme Court
Date
1961-05-15
Outcome
for-government
Holding
Embezzled funds are includible in gross income in the year received notwithstanding an obligation to repay.
Facts
James embezzled funds from his employer and a union. He argued the funds were not income because of his obligation to repay.
Reasoning
Chief Justice Warren held that embezzled funds are taxable when received under a claim of right, overruling Wilcox. The decision extended the Glenshaw Glass approach to illegal gains.
Case metadata
Official opinion
Open official decisionRelated citations
Computed from the cross-reference graph. Links open the related entity on this site.
This entry cites
- StatuteIRC §61
- CaseCommissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.
Primary sources
- Justia: James v. United StatesVerified 2026-05-20
Important disclaimer
This library is for general tax education only. Always verify filing obligations, due dates, and tax consequences against the cited primary source or with a qualified tax professional.