Case detail
Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.
348 U.S. 426 (1955)
Court
Supreme Court
Date
1955-03-28
Outcome
for-government
Holding
Punitive damages received in a private antitrust suit are taxable income under the broad definition of gross income.
Facts
Glenshaw Glass received punitive damages in a private antitrust action and excluded them from gross income, arguing they were not 'gain' within Eisner v. Macomber.
Reasoning
Chief Justice Warren established the broad definition of gross income as 'accessions to wealth, clearly realized, and over which the taxpayers have complete dominion.' This definition explicitly displaced the narrower Eisner v. Macomber test for purposes of Section 61.
Case metadata
Official opinion
Open official decisionCases cited
Related citations
Computed from the cross-reference graph. Links open the related entity on this site.
This entry cites
- StatuteIRC §61
- CaseEisner v. Macomber
Primary sources
- Justia: Commissioner v. Glenshaw GlassVerified 2026-05-20
Important disclaimer
This library is for general tax education only. Always verify filing obligations, due dates, and tax consequences against the cited primary source or with a qualified tax professional.