Case detail
CIC Services, LLC v. Internal Revenue Service
593 U.S. 209 (2021)
Court
Supreme Court
Date
2021-05-17
Outcome
for-taxpayer
Holding
The Anti-Injunction Act does not bar a pre-enforcement challenge to an IRS reporting requirement that is enforced by a separate tax penalty.
Facts
CIC Services challenged IRS Notice 2016-66 designating micro-captive transactions as transactions of interest before any enforcement action.
Reasoning
Justice Kagan held that the reporting requirement was distinct from the eventual tax penalty for noncompliance, and the suit therefore did not seek to restrain the assessment or collection of any tax within the meaning of the Anti-Injunction Act.
Case metadata
Official opinion
Open official decisionRelated citations
Computed from the cross-reference graph. Links open the related entity on this site.
This entry cites
- StatuteIRC §7421
Cited by
- StatuteIRC §7421
Primary sources
- Justia: CIC Services v. IRSVerified 2026-05-20
Important disclaimer
This library is for general tax education only. Always verify filing obligations, due dates, and tax consequences against the cited primary source or with a qualified tax professional.