Case detail
Helvering v. Eubank
311 U.S. 122 (1940)
Court
Supreme Court
Date
1940-11-25
Outcome
for-government
Holding
An insurance agent who assigns renewal commissions earned but not yet payable to another person remains taxable on those commissions when paid because they were earned through his personal services.
Facts
Eubank, a life insurance agent, terminated his agency contracts and later assigned future renewal commissions on previously written policies to assignees. He argued that the commissions paid to the assignees were not taxable to him because they had been transferred before payment.
Reasoning
Following Horst (decided the same day), the Court held that earned income may not be insulated from tax by assignment of the right to collect it. The commissions had been earned by Eubank's prior personal services, and the assignments did not shift the tax burden to the assignees.
Case metadata
Official opinion
Open official decisionRelated citations
Computed from the cross-reference graph. Links open the related entity on this site.
This entry cites
- StatuteIRC §61
- CaseLucas v. Earl
- CaseHelvering v. Horst
Primary sources
- Official opinion PDFVerified 2026-05-20
Important disclaimer
This library is for general tax education only. Always verify filing obligations, due dates, and tax consequences against the cited primary source or with a qualified tax professional.