TaxGuided
2nd Cir. cases

Case detail

Cohan v. Commissioner

39 F.2d 540 (2d Cir. 1930)

Court

2nd Cir.

Date

1930-01-01

Outcome

for-taxpayer

Holding

When the existence of business expenses is established but exact amounts cannot be proved due to lack of records, courts may estimate the deductible amount.

Facts

George M. Cohan kept inadequate records of business entertainment expenses but argued substantial amounts were spent.

Reasoning

Learned Hand established the 'Cohan rule': courts may approximate expenses when the existence of an expense is clear but the precise amount is not. Section 274(d) later limited the Cohan rule for travel, entertainment, and listed-property expenses, requiring strict substantiation.

Case metadata

Jurisdiction: United States
Topics: substantiation, business expenses, estimation
Statutes applied: 26 U.S.C. 162

Official opinion

Open official decision

Related citations

Computed from the cross-reference graph. Links open the related entity on this site.

This entry cites

Primary sources

Important disclaimer

This library is for general tax education only. Always verify filing obligations, due dates, and tax consequences against the cited primary source or with a qualified tax professional.