Case detail
Cohan v. Commissioner
39 F.2d 540 (2d Cir. 1930)
Court
2nd Cir.
Date
1930-01-01
Outcome
for-taxpayer
Holding
When the existence of business expenses is established but exact amounts cannot be proved due to lack of records, courts may estimate the deductible amount.
Facts
George M. Cohan kept inadequate records of business entertainment expenses but argued substantial amounts were spent.
Reasoning
Learned Hand established the 'Cohan rule': courts may approximate expenses when the existence of an expense is clear but the precise amount is not. Section 274(d) later limited the Cohan rule for travel, entertainment, and listed-property expenses, requiring strict substantiation.
Case metadata
Official opinion
Open official decisionRelated citations
Computed from the cross-reference graph. Links open the related entity on this site.
This entry cites
- StatuteIRC §162
Cited by
- CaseSchaefer v. Commissioner
- StatuteIRC §274
Primary sources
- Justia: Cohan v. CommissionerVerified 2026-05-20
Important disclaimer
This library is for general tax education only. Always verify filing obligations, due dates, and tax consequences against the cited primary source or with a qualified tax professional.