Case detail
Inland Revenue Commissioners v. Duke of Westminster
[1936] AC 1
Court
House of Lords
Date
1935-05-07
Outcome
for-taxpayer
Holding
Every person is entitled to so arrange their affairs that the tax attaching is less than it otherwise would be, and the courts will give effect to such arrangements unless the statute otherwise provides.
Facts
The Duke replaced wages to his servants with covenanted annuity payments to obtain a tax advantage. The Inland Revenue argued the arrangement should be disregarded.
Reasoning
Lord Tomlin's much-quoted dictum became the foundation of the 'form over substance' approach in UK tax law. The principle has been significantly narrowed by the Ramsay doctrine and later anti-avoidance developments.
Case metadata
Official opinion
Open official decisionLater cases in this library
Related citations
Computed from the cross-reference graph. Links open the related entity on this site.
Cited by
Primary sources
- BAILII: IRC v Duke of WestminsterVerified 2026-05-20
Important disclaimer
This library is for general tax education only. Always verify filing obligations, due dates, and tax consequences against the cited primary source or with a qualified tax professional.