Case detail
Bywater Investments Ltd v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation
[2016] HCA 45
Court
High Court of Australia
Date
2016-11-16
Outcome
for-government
Holding
Central management and control of a company is exercised where the real decision-making occurs, not necessarily where directors formally meet.
Facts
Bywater Investments and related companies were nominally controlled by Swiss directors but actually directed by a Sydney-based individual.
Reasoning
The High Court of Australia confirmed the central-management-and-control test focuses on substance rather than form. The decision affects Australian tax residency analysis for foreign-incorporated entities with Australian-based decision-makers.
Case metadata
Official opinion
Open official decisionPrimary sources
- AustLII: Bywater InvestmentsVerified 2026-05-20
Important disclaimer
This library is for general tax education only. Always verify filing obligations, due dates, and tax consequences against the cited primary source or with a qualified tax professional.