TaxGuided
High Court of Australia cases

Case detail

Bywater Investments Ltd v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation

[2016] HCA 45

Court

High Court of Australia

Date

2016-11-16

Outcome

for-government

Holding

Central management and control of a company is exercised where the real decision-making occurs, not necessarily where directors formally meet.

Facts

Bywater Investments and related companies were nominally controlled by Swiss directors but actually directed by a Sydney-based individual.

Reasoning

The High Court of Australia confirmed the central-management-and-control test focuses on substance rather than form. The decision affects Australian tax residency analysis for foreign-incorporated entities with Australian-based decision-makers.

Case metadata

Jurisdiction: Australia
Topics: corporate residency, central management and control
Statutes applied: Income Tax Assessment Act 1936

Official opinion

Open official decision

Primary sources

Important disclaimer

This library is for general tax education only. Always verify filing obligations, due dates, and tax consequences against the cited primary source or with a qualified tax professional.