TaxGuided
High Court of Australia cases

Case detail

Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Spotless Services Ltd

[1996] HCA 34

Court

High Court of Australia

Date

1996-12-03

Outcome

for-government

Holding

Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 applies where a sole or dominant purpose of a scheme was to obtain a tax benefit, even if there was a commercial purpose.

Facts

Spotless invested in a Cook Islands deposit structure that produced foreign-tax-exempt interest.

Reasoning

The High Court of Australia held that Part IVA applied because obtaining the tax benefit was the dominant purpose. The case is the leading authority on the dominant-purpose test under Part IVA.

Case metadata

Jurisdiction: Australia
Topics: Part IVA, tax avoidance, dominant purpose
Statutes applied: Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Part IVA

Official opinion

Open official decision

Related citations

Computed from the cross-reference graph. Links open the related entity on this site.

Primary sources

Important disclaimer

This library is for general tax education only. Always verify filing obligations, due dates, and tax consequences against the cited primary source or with a qualified tax professional.