Why can Australian contractors earn through a company or trust and still get pulled back into the personal services income rules?

Question

People in Australia often assume that once contracting income is invoiced through an entity, the tax system must accept it as business income on the entity's own terms. Please explain why PSI rules disrupt that assumption and why the taxpayer's own labour is still the centre of gravity.

TaxGuided · Accepted Answer

Contractors often build structures for sensible commercial reasons, but the ATO does not stop asking what generated the income in the first place. Where income is mainly a reward for an individual's own efforts or skills, the personal services income rules can step in. That is why an elegant company or trust setup does not automatically convert labour income into ordinary business income with a fresh tax identity.

So PSI is not anti-entity. It is anti-disguise.

This is where many otherwise sop

Why can Australian contractors earn through a company or trust and still get pulled back into the personal services income rules?

Have a similar question?